Judgment.

What Judgment means

When the correct answer is not obviously apparent, the leader may need to determine which available option is least wrong. That means tracing plausible second- and third-order effects, comparing them against the situation and objective, and making only those assumptions required to bridge genuinely missing information. Assumptions should be explicit and conditional: if an assumption changes, the projected consequences and potentially the decision should be reconsidered.

How do you decide when the right answer is not apparent?

Start by accepting that complexity may not offer an obviously correct option. Compare the credible choices and ask which is least wrong relative to the objective, current conditions, constraints, and acceptable risk.

1. Define the objective and the decision that actually has to be made.
2. Identify what is known, what is unknown, and what is merely assumed.
3. For each credible option, trace the immediate effect and then the likely second- and third-order effects.
4. Use assumptions only where missing information prevents the analysis from continuing. State each necessary assumption explicitly.
5. Test the branches: if an assumption proves true, what follows; if it proves false, how do the consequences change?
6. Compare the resulting paths against the objective, values, constraints, reversibility, and acceptable risk.
7. Choose the option that is most appropriate to the situation—even when that means choosing the least-wrong option rather than pretending certainty exists.

Judgment does not end when the decision is made. Because assumptions and conditions can change, leaders should identify which signals would require them to reassess the decision.

When the right answer is not apparent, determine what is least wrong—and make the assumptions and consequences visible.

Return to canonical definitions →